For in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but he rested on the seventh day. Therefore the LORD blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy. Exodus 20:11
"The Israelites are to observe the Sabbath, celebrating it for the generations to come as a lasting covenant. It will be a sign between me and the Israelites forever, for in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, and on the seventh day he abstained from work and rested.'" Exodus 31:16-17
By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible. Hebrews 11:3
"But do not think I will accuse you before the Father. Your accuser is Moses, on whom your hopes are set. If you believed Moses, you would believe me, for he wrote about me. But since you do not believe what he wrote, how are you going to believe what I say?" John 5:45-47
I am about to write my thoughts about the six days of Creation, I repeat, these are my thoughts. There are several views about the length of Creation. I urge everyone not to accept my view, but to read the Scriptures and come to your own decision from the Word of God. I have no desire to be didactic here, only to explain what I believe and why.
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters. And God said, "Let there be light," and there was light. Genesis 1:1-3
In Young's Literal Translation, Genesis 1:1-3 reads:
"In the beginning of God's preparing of the heavens and the earth -- the earth hath existed waste and void, and darkness on the face of the deep, and the Spirit of God fluttering on the face of the waters, and God saith, 'Let light be;' and light is.
Genesis One tells us God created the heavens and the earth. It indicates the earth existed in a state of waste, void of life or anything. The Literal Translation implies a possible gap in the creation of the forming of the matter and the six days of preparing earth for life. This gap could be short, could be long. I don't know if there really was such a gap or how long it lasted, and it doesn't matter because God doesn't deal with anything here but the heavens and the earth we know and how it concerns mankind.
God is eternal. Time does not apply to God. The earth is finite because He created it so. Time, as we know it, was designed for the creation, not for the Creator. God has no beginning or end. The earth has both. All our measures of time are dictated by the way the creation was designed.
The earth as created by God turns on its axis. It is not the sun or moon that dictates a day's length, it is the revolution of the earth. At the beginning earth was in darkness. I believe this was really, really, really dark darkness. Darkness is the absence of God.
God said, "'Let light be'; and light is." This light was not sunlight. It was light. God created light and later he endowed certain objects of have light. This first light was some kind of Godly light. I don't personally think the light referred to here was God although scripture says: "God is light; in him there is no darkness at all." (1 John 1:5b) I believe this was the creation of the light we see.
Whichever, light existed separate of the sun and other objects we attribute it to today. Two reasons: First, the sun, moon and stars weren't created until the fourth day. Second, Revelation tells us someday God will do away with the Sun, moon and stars, yet "there will be no more night. They will not need the light of a lamp or the light of the sun, for the Lord God will give them light." There will also be no more time.
But in the beginning, when light had been created, as the earth revolved on its axis, there was night and there was day, a day. Why not accept what it says? I know there are arguments that “Yowm”, translated “day”, can be used to mean a period of time, that so can the phrases "there is night, there is morning". But why try to build large constructs when single day will do? Why not apply Occam's Razor, "one should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything"?
I use to go; well everything fits with the evolutionary concept of creation. There was an occurrence, things were formed, there was light, there was an earth of primeval soup out of which land formed and seas were separated as the temperature cooled. Then came all the plants and animals and finally man. Why, there is no conflict between God and science. Time doesn't even exist for God, so length isn't a problem.
But there are two problems to my mind, one supernatural, and the other natural.
"In the beginning God created." God said, "let there be light; and there was light". Hebrews 11 says, "By faith, we understand the universe was made at God's command". God said to the Israelites, "For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth". These statements do not say God created a process and it moved slowly from simple to complex. These are actions that seem to spring instantly from the will of God. The verses say there were a night and a morning and a day each time, but this doesn't necessarily mean it took God 24 hours to create each thing, only that each creation was done on a separate day. Why can't we accept that God didn't need million of years to accomplish this. Hebrews 11 also says, "that what is seen was not made out of what is visible"; in other words, that which existed on God's command did not evolve out of something previously existing, so when God said let there be plants, there were plants. When I was trying to line up Divine Creation with natural creation, wasn't I merely trying to appease those who scoff at my faith in the power of God? Wasn't it my pride afraid of being laughed at for being so ignorant of scientific speculation? I have come to believe everything that anyone believes, whether God or science, is a matter of faith. Why should I fear their faith if I truly believe my own?
There is a natural problem as well. It is that third and fourth day. On the third day, God said: `Let the earth yield tender grass, herb sowing seed, fruit-tree (whose seed [is] in itself) making fruit after its kind, on the earth:' and it is so. Why is this a natural problem? It is because God didn't illuminate the Sun, moon and stars until the fourth day. `Let luminaries be in the expanse of the heavens, to make a separation between the day and the night, then they have been for signs, and for seasons, and for days and years, and they have been for luminaries in the expanse of the heavens to give light upon the earth:' and it is so.
If God set up an evolutionary process over millions, or even thousands, of years for his Creation to develop, how would plants blossom and bloom before they had the sunlight needed for photosynthesis to produce their food, if the sun didn't evolve until many, many years later? You cannot line up God's Creative order with the evolutionary order. So why try to make God's Creation last the millions of years necessary for evolutionary theories to work?
I would say that God had the power to nourish the plants however he chose. But everything you read in Scripture about God shows order. If there is an odd hiccup in a sequence it is usually on purpose to get your attention. If all the plants were created on a single day, they would last until God gave the Sun the power of light the next day.
There is a second aspect to this setting of luminaries in the heavens. They mark the seasons. They are markers of time. We already have the earth rotating on an axis, which gave us a day. Now we have a sun for the earth to orbit around, giving us our year, and we have a moon orbiting the earth, giving us our month. Thus we don't have arbitrary measures for our lives, but a standard. Why then should we have one other important measure of our calendar that is arbitrary, namely the week?
We don't. We have our week because God created the heavens and the earth in six days and rested on the seventh. If God has set a standard of seven 24-hour days as the basic work week of humans, why do we want to stretch that standard when applied to Him?
Now there is another interesting statement made on the sixth day, after the creation of all the creatures with the breath of life in them, including man. It is this:
"Then God said, "I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food. And to all the beasts of the earth and all the birds of the air and all the creatures that move on the ground--everything that has the breath of life in it--I give every green plant for food." And it was so." Genesis 1:29-30
There is no reason not to think Isaiah 11:6's prophesy of the future, "The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, The leopard shall lie down with the young goat, The calf and the young lion and the fatling together; And a little child shall lead them," is not a return to the state of the Garden of Eden. Until the fall, there were no carnivores. Every creature was a vegetarian. So how do I accept eons of bloodthirsty beasts tearing at each other before Adam and Eve?
In one comment, the question was raised, what did the animals do to deserve to die? The answer is nothing. That is the point, when Adam and Eve disobeyed God and sinned they could not adequately cover themselves with leaves. An innocent sacrifice was needed to atone for them and God spilt the first blood by slaying animals for their skins to cover Adam and Eve, pointing millenniums ahead to the Lamb of God, Christ, the innocent shedding His blood to cover our sins. It was sin that brought death into the world and all the bloodshed that followed, human or animal.
I guess I could touch on one more point concerning length of time. In Genesis 2:2-4 The woman said to the serpent, "We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, but God did say, 'You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.' " "You will not surely die," the serpent said to the woman.
Who lied here? Was it God or Satan in the form of the serpent? Adam and Eve ate the fruit and didn't drop over dead. God confronted them and some animals died, but Adam and Eve went on to live a long life. Adam lived to be 930 years in fact. Now if we want to use the thousand years is as a day as the Lord's yardstick, then Adam didn't live to be a thousand, so he did die on the day he ate the fruit. But again, why not stay with the simple words of the text. God didn't say they would drop dead, he said they will truly die, and they did die physically eventually, which they would never have done if they had obeyed God. However, the moment they bit into that fruit they died spiritually.
Anyway, I am drifting toward other subjects. These things are some of the thoughts I have, my opinion, my wrestling with the subject of the length of Creation. I am willing to except what the Bible says is what the Bible means unless it is clearly shown as allegoric, symbolic or parable. Again, please don't accept anything I say, but study the Word and come to what you believe for yourself.
(The photograph at the top was taken by the author in the Rocky Mountains near Vail, Colorado, August 1999.)